Intellectual Property

Go from buried in prosecution backlogs to commanding your IP practice

AI-powered IP documents, right inside Word or Google Docs. Whether you're a solo patent attorney or a 50-person IP group, Junior gives you GPT, Claude, and Gemini, configured for legal, so you can build repeatable processes and scale what works.

Microsoft WordPatent Application Draft
DraftChatInputsDrawingsClaimsRules
Patent Application DraftUtility Patent — Claims & Specification
JR3
You
Draft a utility patent for an ML-based diagnostic tool with 3 independent claims
JR3
Building specification with detailed embodiments and claim hierarchy...
You
Include dependent claims for data preprocessing steps
JR3
Adding 12 dependent claims covering feature extraction and model inference

Trusted by Solo Practitioners, Small Firms, and Enterprise Legal Teams

Intellectual property practices face specific challenges

Years of IP expertise, from patent prosecution strategies, office action response frameworks, claim construction approaches, licensing negotiation guidelines, trademark clearance methodologies, to IP due diligence protocols, live in your head or your lead attorney's. That knowledge is valuable, and whether you're a solo or a growing firm, it's at risk of being lost.

Solo Practitioner

As a solo, you're redrafting your own work. Your claim construction instincts, office action response strategies, and prosecution history knowledge are valuable, and entirely trapped in your head.

Small Firm (2–5)

Your senior attorney can't review every junior's office action response or patent application draft. Knowledge stays siloed and clients notice when continuation strategies lack the sophistication they expect.

Mid-Size Firm (6–25)

Inconsistency across your IP team. Junior in Office A doesn't know Partner C's approach to means-plus-function claims or multi-class trademark prosecution strategy.

Large Firm (25+)

Knowledge scattered across multiple offices and technology groups. New team members don't know your firm's approach to patent portfolio management across jurisdictions or coordinated IP due diligence for complex transactions.

No More New Tools. No Copy-Pasting.
No Tab-Switching.

ChatGPT writes a draft. Then what? JR3 picks up where generic AI and legal tools fall short, structuring, refining, and finalizing intellectual property documents to your exact standards, right inside the tools you already use. Start in ChatGPT, Claude, or directly in your document. Junior picks up from there. Review, refine, and finalize without ever leaving Word or Google Docs.

How It Works

Three steps to scaling your expertise

01

Start with your templates

Upload your prior patent applications, office action responses, licensing agreements, trademark prosecution files, IP due diligence reports, and opinion letters. JR3 pulls structure, formatting, and clause patterns from your documents so new drafts start from your baseline, not a blank page.

02

Draft with real-time guidance

When someone drafts a patent application or office action response, JR3 suggests structural scaffolding from your prior work: preferred claim construction frameworks, continuation strategies, and prior art argument structures. It highlights where a draft departs from your typical patterns so you can decide whether to adjust.

03

Let expertise scale to every team member

Whether you're accelerating your own drafting or scaling knowledge across a growing practice, everyone has access to proven approaches. Faster drafts. Fewer revisions. Better strategy applied consistently.

Every Document Task. One Platform.

From template to first draft to final delivery. Junior handles the full document lifecycle so you spend time on legal strategy, not document drafting.

AI-Powered Drafting

Draft any intellectual property document from scratch: patent applications, office action responses, licensing agreements, trademark filings, IP opinions, and more. Describe what you need. Junior writes it.

Document Intelligence

Upload your existing intellectual property documents. Junior uses your language, your clause preferences, and your standards, then generates new work that sounds like it came from your practice.

Automated Workflows

Define your review and drafting steps once. Junior runs them automatically on every document, enforcing your standards without anyone having to check.

Consistent Output

Enforce your style, tone, and legal standards across every intellectual property document, regardless of who drafts it.

Document Completion

Upload partial, legacy, or incomplete documents. Identify missing sections and insert required legal language automatically.

Client Deliverables

Share finalized documents with clients and patent offices. Maintain institutional style and eliminate repetitive manual work.

Documents that draft themselves

10 core intellectual property documents. 52 hours of current drafting time reduced to 14.5 hours. That's 37+ hours back per matter.

Document

Current

With JR3

Saved

Utility Patent Application (Specification & Claims)

10 hrs

3 hrs

7 hrs

Office Action Response

5 hrs

1.5 hrs

3.5 hrs

Continuation / CIP Application

6 hrs

1.75 hrs

4.25 hrs

Trademark Application (Use-Based / ITU)

3 hrs

0.75 hrs

2.25 hrs

Trademark Office Action Response

3.5 hrs

1 hr

2.5 hrs

IP Licensing Agreement

6 hrs

1.75 hrs

4.25 hrs

Freedom-to-Operate Opinion

6 hrs

1.75 hrs

4.25 hrs

IP Due Diligence Report

5.5 hrs

1.5 hrs

4 hrs

Non-Infringement / Invalidity Opinion

4.5 hrs

1 hr

3.5 hrs

Provisional Patent Application

2.5 hrs

0.5 hrs

2 hrs

Total per matter

52 hrs

14.5 hrs

37.5 hrs

Configures to Your Documents. Aligns to Your Standards.

No two intellectual property practices work the same way. JR3 adapts to your firm's documents, claim drafting conventions, and prosecution preferences, not the other way around.

Real-World Scenarios

See JR3 in action

Complex Continuation Application with Extensive Prosecution History

A biotech client needs a continuation-in-part application that builds on a parent patent with a 4-year prosecution history, 12 prior office action responses, and three related family members. The new application must thread the needle between the parent's prosecution history estoppel, newly added experimental data, and the examiner's prior art rejections, and the assigned associate has never handled a continuation with this level of file wrapper complexity. But your firm has prosecuted over 200 continuation applications in the biotech space.

Without JR3:

Associate spends two weeks tracing the prosecution history across all family members, trying to reconstruct the claim amendment rationale from scattered file wrappers. Partner review reveals the draft inadvertently broadened claims in a way that triggers prosecution history estoppel from a 2022 office action response. The specification lacks the written description support your firm established in a nearly identical CIP last year. Full rewrite. 20+ hours consumed.

With JR3:

JR3 surfaces prior continuation applications from your firm in this technology space, showing the claim narrowing strategies and written description language that were previously accepted. It flags prosecution history estoppel boundaries from the parent file wrapper that require careful claim differentiation. Application ready for partner review in half the time.

12-15 hours saved per application. Stronger claims built on institutional prosecution history knowledge with no estoppel traps.

Multi-Jurisdictional IP Due Diligence for Technology Acquisition

Your client is acquiring a SaaS company with a portfolio of 28 patents, 45 pending applications across six jurisdictions, 12 registered trademarks, and significant trade secret assets. The deal timeline requires a comprehensive IP due diligence report within three weeks covering freedom-to-operate risks, portfolio strength assessment, pending prosecution status, and third-party license obligations. Your firm has handled similar technology M&A due diligence, but that institutional knowledge lives across three partners and dozens of prior transaction files.

Without JR3:

Associates start from scratch on each jurisdiction's patent portfolio analysis, manually cross-referencing prosecution statuses, license agreements, and prior art landscapes. Partner review reveals inconsistent risk assessments between the patent and trademark teams, missed open-source license obligations in the software stack, and a failure to flag two pending inter partes review proceedings that could invalidate key portfolio assets. Four rounds of revisions. 50+ attorney hours across the project.

With JR3:

JR3 pulls your firm's prior technology M&A due diligence report structures, including risk matrix formats and open-source license audit frameworks from similar transactions. It flags applications in this portfolio that match risk patterns your firm has encountered before, recommending accelerated review of those claims before closing.

25+ hours saved across the project. Consistent portfolio assessment built from proven institutional due diligence frameworks.

Templates from the Best in Each Field.

Access document frameworks contributed by recognized specialists: patent prosecutors, trademark attorneys, IP licensing counsel, freedom-to-operate analysts, and IP transaction advisors. Use their guidelines directly inside JR3, or contribute your own to reach thousands of intellectual property professionals.

A growing list of contributors

Specialist templates

Updated regularly

Built for how intellectual property professionals actually work

Institutional Knowledge Scales

Your firm's approach to patent applications, office action responses, claim construction strategies, licensing agreements, trademark prosecution, IP opinions, becomes available to every team member in context, as they draft.

Expertise Doesn't Evaporate

When experienced intellectual property counsel transitions or leaves, their knowledge of examiner tendencies, prosecution strategies, claim drafting conventions, and client portfolio histories stays in the system.

Consistency Across Your Team

Every junior applies your firm's standard approach. Every office action response uses your preferred argument structure. Every patent application follows your claim drafting framework. Consistency without centralized oversight.

Faster Drafting, Better Outcomes

Juniors complete first drafts significantly faster. Partner review time drops dramatically. Strategy for the assigned matter is applied automatically.

New Hires Learn Faster

New associates have access to institutional knowledge from day one. No painful redline cycles needed to learn your firm's approach.

Enterprise-grade security. Built by attorneys.

Your confidential intellectual property matters, including patent prosecution strategies, trade secret documentation, licensing positions, and client portfolio data, deserve the highest security standards. Documents are processed in transit and never stored: zero-retention architecture, SOC 2 Type II certified, HIPAA compliant, GDPR compliant.

ISO 27001Certified
Active
SOC 2Type II
Active
GDPRCompliant
Active
Zero Data RetentionEnforced
Active

3.7M

patent applications filed worldwide in 2024, a 4.9% increase over 2023 and the fastest year-on-year growth since 2018, driving sustained demand for IP prosecution counsel who can manage growing portfolios efficiently

$3.6M

median cost to litigate a single patent infringement case through trial when more than $25 million is at risk, making efficient IP document preparation and prosecution strategy a critical cost lever for every firm

$17.2B

global intellectual property legal services market in 2025, growing at 7.7% annually, reflecting accelerating demand as innovation-driven industries file more patents, trademarks, and trade secret claims worldwide

Common Questions

Will this work for our specific approach to IP?

Yes. JR3 applies your actual work: your approach to patent applications, office action responses, claim construction, licensing agreements, trademark prosecution, and IP opinions. If your firm uses dependent-claim-first narrowing strategies in continuations or applies specific written description frameworks for biotech applications, JR3 uses that. The system adapts to how you work, not the reverse.

What if JR3 suggests something that contradicts my judgment?

You're always in control. JR3 surfaces patterns and options from your prior work, such as claim language that has been accepted in similar applications. You decide. It's a drafting assistant that references what you've done before, not a system that tells you what to do.

Will our confidential IP matters be stored or used to train public AI?

No. Zero retention. Your confidential intellectual property matters, including patent prosecution strategies, trade secret documentation, client portfolio data, and licensing positions, are analyzed in-memory and never stored on servers, never shared, never used to train public models. SOC 2 Type II certified, HIPAA compliant, GDPR compliant.

How long does it take to set up?

Day one. JR3 works inside Word and Google Docs. Week one, it starts learning from your IP matters. Week two, first suggestions surface. No templates to engineer. No workflows to redesign.

See how intellectual property professionals save 37+ hours per matter

20-minute demo with one of our attorneys. Customized for your firm size and approach. No credit card required. No long-term commitment.