One intelligent grid for every claim chart
Universal Charts builds every claim-chart analysis — SEP, infringement, prior art, family, enablement/validity — on the same intelligent grid: element-by-element mapping with confidence scores and citations, then straight through the Cowork Canvas and Microsoft Word to the deliverables the chart justifies.
One grid, every analysis
SEP, infringement, prior art, family, contract — every chart type is built on the same intelligent grid, with nested §112 enablement and claim-refinement columns on top.
Straight from USPTO records
Universal Charts pulls the full claim set — every independent and dependent claim — before a single cell is charted.
Scored and cited
Confidence scores and citations to the underlying literature on every element-by-element read-on.
Court-ready in one click
Export to a formatted Word claim chart or an Excel workbook — citations and confidence intact.
Start from the complete authoritative record
Pull the asserted patent straight from USPTO records — or paste or upload the claims. Before charting, Universal Charts retrieves the entire claim set, so you see the whole asserted scope at a glance and then choose exactly what to chart.
- ✓Load directly from USPTO records, or paste / upload the claims
- ✓Every independent and dependent claim, listed for selection
- ✓The whole asserted scope in view before a single cell is charted
Exact claim language. Your element boundaries.
Junior decomposes the claim into atomic, chart-ready elements — exact claim language, no paraphrasing. When one element bundles two limitations, split the contested one into its own row and isolate exactly where the gap will land. You drive the mapping, not the model.
- ✓Atomic, chart-ready elements in exact claim language — no paraphrasing
- ✓Split bundled limitations into their own rows
- ✓The attorney controls every element boundary
The chart points you straight at the contested limitation
Junior maps each claim element to the accused product and scores it, citing the product literature as it goes. Then nest child columns for the deeper reads — an Enablement (§112) column slides out beneath the Source and maps each element to spec support, while a Claim Refinement column under the target proposes amendments that better capture the mapped features.
- ✓Strong / Possible / Weak scoring with citations on every read-on
- ✓Nested child-column analyses run in parallel — §112 enablement, claim refinement
- ✓The chart doesn't just find gaps — it proposes the amendments that close them
Demo matter: Meridian's US 11,842,310 charted against the Aurora Buds Pro — six of seven elements read literally, an isolated 41% gap at element 1E, and a thin-support §112 flag. Illustrative content, not a customer result.
Every cell is intelligent
Every cell carries its own confidence, evidence, and a live conversation — shift-click one or several to work them together. Open the inspector rail and press JR3 on how solid the read really is: it answers from what it mapped, cites the target's own spec language, and gathers every reference it relied on in the cell's Manifest, each linked back to its source. Nothing ever leaves the chart.
- ✓Interrogate the AI's read in a real back-and-forth, cell by cell
- ✓The Manifest gathers every cited reference, linked to its source
- ✓Multi-select cells and work them together
- ✓Per-cell confidence and evidence, cited from the record — never invented
One intelligent, collaborative claim chart
Share the chart with the whole team. Editors map, refine, and annotate the same live grid together, and every note is attributed to its author. JR3's analysis, the team's commentary, the §112 column and the refinements — every contribution on one live grid, human and AI side by side. When the chart is worked, one click sends it out as a formatted Word claim chart or an Excel workbook, citations and confidence intact.
- ✓Collaborators annotate the same grid at the same time
- ✓Every note attributed to its author — human or AI
- ✓One shared source of truth instead of emailed spreadsheet versions
- ✓One-click export to a formatted Word claim chart or Excel workbook
Chart findings become filing-ready claims
In the Cowork Canvas — a live JR3 workspace that carries the chart's source claims right alongside the chat — open Skills, your saved and tagged workflows, and run Prepare Continuation Claims for Product Coverage: JR3 mines the family disclosure and the mapped product features to draft a 20-claim continuation set — independent device, method and medium claims plus dependents — deliberately tuned to close the exact gap the chart exposed.
- ✓The chart's source claims ride along in the canvas side panel
- ✓Saved Skills run the workflows your practice already trusts
- ✓Every claim stays editable — Junior drafts the language, the attorney decides what stays
- ✓One click saves the set into the matter, beside the chart that justified it
Tracked changes. Every decision the attorney's.
Drafting finishes where attorneys actually write. The Junior.Law task pane adds JR3 to Microsoft Word in one click, and the entire matter — the patent, the generated claim chart, the evidence, comments, notes, even the cell conversations — imports as drafting context. JR3 surfaces injectable claim edits, each shown against the claim text it changes. Accepted amendments land in the CLAIMS section as Word tracked changes; rejections capture your typed rationale — and the Skill folds every accept and reject back in, so the next continuation drafts closer to your judgment.
- ✓Import the whole claim-chart project — no re-uploading, no lost context
- ✓Every amendment lands as a Word tracked change
- ✓Rejections carry the attorney's own reasoning
- ✓The skill learns from each decision and compounds over time
The memo cites the chart that justified it
Junior offers the matter's natural follow-ons in the same thread — a demand letter, a doctrine-of-equivalents memo, or infringement contentions. Pick the DoE memo to brief the contested gap: on the Draft tab, one Draft all click builds all eight sections — Question Presented, Brief Answer, background, the legal standard, the function–way–result analysis — with the drafted text tracked into the Word document as it goes. Then highlight any passage and rewrite it in plain language: ask for citations to the claim chart, and inline citations plus a claim-chart support table transpose in as tracked insertions.
- ✓A complete, correctly structured memo in one click — eight sections, tracked into Word
- ✓Every prompt is a live anchor — click it and the document jumps to its drafted text
- ✓Highlight-to-rewrite weaves in claim-chart citations and a support table
You drive the mapping, not the model.
Exact claim language, no paraphrasing · Flagged as AI, fully editable · Every decision the attorney's
Bring every claim chart onto one intelligent grid
From element-by-element mapping to a coverage-tuned continuation set and a DoE memo that cites the chart — see Universal Charts on a matter like yours.