July 2026 Release · Prior Art Search & Charting

From invention disclosure to client-ready report — in one conversation.

Describe the invention in plain language. JR3 extracts the inventive elements, drafts sample claims, searches 11 patent offices worldwide, builds the Prior Art Analysis Chart live with cited evidence, and delivers a Microsoft Word report straight to your client's inbox.

The Prior Art Analysis Chart building live with cited evidence and strength grading

The Prior Art Analysis Chart building live — claim elements 1[a]–1[e] against the four closest references, each cell graded Strong · Possible · Weak · Not Found. Illustrative demo matter.

11 offices

US · EP · WO · CN · JP · KR · DE · GB · CA · AU · IN — searched with live per-office hit counts.

1,192 24 4

Demo matter: a defensible funnel — every hit, the references reviewed in depth, and the closest, charted.

col. & line

Pinpoint citations behind every chart cell — columns and lines, figures, even file-history remarks.

.docx + .xlsx

A structured Word search report and the Excel analysis chart, auto-saved to the project.

Skills Library

One click loads the entire workflow

Everything starts at universe.junior.law. Open the Skills Library, pick Prior Art Search — “Search 11 patent offices, chart claims against the findings, and generate a search report” — and the Skill loads straight into the chat composer. No setup, no search syntax.

  • A library of patent-specific Skills — Office Action Response, Claim Chart Builder, Case Law Search, Examiner Analytics and more
  • Suggested actions right on the home page — including “Find prior art for an invention”
  • One click on Use and the Skill badge is live in the composer
Selecting the Prior Art Search Skill from the Skills Library in JR3 Universe

Define the Invention

Plain language is the whole brief

Type the disclosure the way the inventor described it to you. One prompt commissions the full analysis — the top five inventive elements, three sample claims, and a prior art chart mapping those claims against the findings. Then JR3 goes to work.

  • No query syntax or search-operator expertise required
  • One prompt: element extraction + sample claims + the full chart
  • The disclosure posts to the chat and the analysis starts immediately
Typing an invention disclosure in plain language into the JR3 composer

Global Coverage

11 patent offices, searched in the open

JR3 shows its work: first the extracted inventive elements, then a live search card with per-office hit counts across US, EP, WO, CN, JP, KR, DE, GB, CA, AU and IN. In the demo matter, 1,192 hits narrow to 24 references reviewed in depth, and the four closest are charted — a funnel you can stand behind.

  • Live hit counts for every office as the search runs
  • 1,192 hits → 24 reviewed in depth → 4 charted
  • Cited references pulled automatically via PDAPI
Live global patent search across 11 patent offices with per-office hit counts

Evidence on Demand

Click any cell — pinpoint citations, column and line

The Prior Art Analysis Chart isn’t a black-box deliverable. Claim elements run down the rows, the closest references across the columns, and every cell carries a strength grade — Strong, Possible, Weak or Not Found — with a source count. Click one and the evidence opens: column-and-line citations, figures, even file-history remarks, each with a Copy button and full context. Open the Chart Cowork panel and interrogate any mapping: JR3 defends its grading and surfaces your strongest novelty argument.

  • Pinpoint citations behind every cell — e.g. “col. 9 ll. 3–19”
  • Strength at a glance — the demo chart tallies 6 Strong · 6 Possible · 6 Weak · 2 Not Found
  • Specification passages, figures and file-history remarks, all cited
  • Ask why a cell is graded Weak — get a reasoned, cited answer
Clicking a chart cell to reveal pinpoint evidence citations and asking JR3 about the mapping

Client-Ready Report

One request. A Word report in the project.

Ask for the report and JR3 drafts it in the format attorneys actually deliver: search scope, element analysis, the claim chart and a full citation appendix — a Microsoft Word file saved to the project and ready for client review.

  • Structured .docx: scope, element analysis, chart, appendix
  • Auto-saved to project files — one click to open in Word
  • The analysis chart exports too, saved as an Excel workbook
Generating the prior art search report as a Microsoft Word file saved to the project

Create Your Own Search Flow

Type it once — save it as a Skill

The packaged Skill is a starting point, not a ceiling. Write the flow exactly how your firm works — create the project, search all patent databases, list the key features, prepare a sample claim set, chart the results, pull cited references via PDAPI — and JR3 runs it end to end. One click on Save this flow as a Skill templatizes it for next time.

  • Free-typed, multi-step instructions executed end to end
  • Your prompt is auto-parameterized into a reusable template — [invention], [project name]
  • Saved to your Skills Library: your firm’s working style, one click next time
Typing a custom multi-step search workflow and saving it as a reusable Skill

From Project to Inbox

Files → Email — auto-populated, attorney-ready

Every deliverable lands in the project’s Project Files tab, saved by JR3 — the Word report, the Excel chart and all four cited-reference PDFs. Select them, hit Email, and a client letter drafts itself from the Client Results Letter template: recipients, subject line, a results summary with the strategy note, and real file attachments.

  • Report · chart · every cited reference — one place
  • Template auto-populates To, Cc, subject and attachments — Rewrite with JR3 on tap
  • JR3 Native Send: attachments delivered as real files, saved to Sent — or open in Gmail or Outlook
  • Delivered and preserved in the project record
Selecting project files and sending an auto-populated client email with real attachments

Ask why — JR3 defends every mapping

US '563 changes priority only after a full pipeline drain (col. 21 ll. 8–17). Claim 1[e] requires re-prioritizing in-flight inferences without interruption — charted Weak. That distinction is your strongest novelty hook.

— JR3, defending a grading in Chart Cowork (demo matter)

Prior art, handled.

Run the skill. Chart with evidence. Report → client email. The workflow is live today: universe.junior.lawSkills LibraryPrior Art Search